Whom would you rather give money to: a needy person in your neighborhood, or a needy person in a foreign country? According to new research from Karen Winterich, if you’re a man, you’re more likely to give to the person closest to you, that is, the one in your neighborhoodâ€”if you give at all.
If you’re a woman, you’re more likely to give, and to give equal amounts to both groups.
Research by Mays assistant professor of marketing Karen Winterich says that charitable behavior to different groups by an individual can be determined based on just two factors: gender and moral identity.
Winterich, an assistant professor of marketing at Texas A&M University’s Mays Business School, says that she can predict charitable behavior to different groups by an individual based on just two factors: gender and moral identity. (Moral identity is a measure of not how moral a person actually is, but rather how important it is to that person to be caring, kind, fair, honest, etc.) The results of Winterich’s studies involving American participants have implications for those in the fundraising arena.
The study looked at how people responded to a need within an “ingroup” and an “outgroup.” An ingroup has an obvious connection to the potential donor, such as distance or ethnicity, while the outgroup might have nothing more than humanity to relate it to the donor.
In the study, participants completed a survey to gauge their moral identity. Later on, each was given five $1 bills and three options: keep the cash, give it to a Hurricane Katrina relief fund, or give it to a relief fund for victims of the Indian Ocean tsunami.
The results were very consistent. Women with higher moral identity were more likely to split their dollars evenly between the two charities. Women with lower moral identities gave more to the ingroup (Katrina victims).
Men with high moral identities gave to the ingroup, but seldom to the outgroup (tsunami victims). Men with low moral identities pocketed the cash.
Winterich’s work reinforces other studies of moral identity that show its correlation to how an individual expands his or her bubble of concern to include others. Low moral identity indicates a person will be more focused on self; high moral identity means a person will be more focused on others.
The bottom line for fundraisers, says Winterich, is that they need to examine how they position themselves relative to their potential donor. Charities must focus on the relationship between the donor and cause to be sure that the charity is viewed as an ingroup, particularly if men are the target. Also, since women tend to be more generous, charities should target them specifically whenever possible.
Additionally, priming a potential donor to think about their moral identity can make them more charitable than they might otherwise be.
There was one other surprise from this study. “It was shocking to me how much they gave. I think it says good things for society,” said Winterich. This new research is forthcoming in the Journal of Consumer Research. Co-authors on the paper are Vikas Mittal at Rice University and William T. Ross at Penn State University.
Categories: Research Notes